The Impact of Growth Mindset Interventions on Student Achievement
Article Sidebar
-
Academic Resilience, Growth Mindset, Student Achievement
Abstract
A student’s underlying beliefs about intelligence—whether it is a fixed trait or can be developed (a “mindset”)—is a powerful predictor of academic resilience and achievement. Fostering a growth mindset, the belief that intelligence is malleable, has been identified as a critical target for educational interventions aimed at improving student success. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the impact of a targeted, school-based growth mindset intervention on the academic achievement and perseverance of middle school students in a challenging subject. A quasi-experimental, pre-test/post-test study was conducted with 250 8th-grade students. The intervention group (n=125) participated in six workshops focused on neuroplasticity and growth mindset principles. The control group (n=125) received standard study skills training. Academic achievement was measured by mathematics grades and standardized test scores. The intervention group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in their mathematics grades (p < .01) and reported higher levels of academic perseverance compared to the control group. The control group showed no significant change in either measure over the same period. Targeted, low-cost growth mindset interventions are an effective strategy for improving student academic achievement. Fostering the belief that intellectual abilities can be developed through effort is a powerful pedagogical tool for enhancing student success and resilience.
Full text article
References
Alaswad, A., & Junaid, S. (2022). DEBATE AS A TOOL IN ENGINEERING AND SUSTAINABILITY EDUCATION. In Gudjonsdottir M.S., Audunsson H., Donoso A.M., Kristjansson G., Saemundsdottir I., Foley J.T., Kyas M., Sripakagorn A., Roslof J., Bennedsen J., Edstrom K., Kuptasthien N., & Lyng R. (Eds.), Proc. Int. CDIO. Conf. (pp. 1003–1008). Chalmers University of Technology; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85145894939&partnerID=40&md5=c676bff22361dacce337526aad649adb
Ariza, J. Á. (2023). Bringing active learning, experimentation, and student-created videos in engineering: A study about teaching electronics and physical computing integrating online and mobile learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(6), 1723–1749. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22673
Asok, D., Abirami, A. M., Angeline CV, N., & Lavanya, R. (2017). Active learning environment for achieving higher-order thinking skills in engineering education. In Ramachandran M., Garg D., & Kumar V.A. (Eds.), Proc. - IEEE Int. Conf. MOOCs, Innov. Technol. Educ., MITE (pp. 47–53). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2016.69
Ayala, S. C., Calvo, J. Z., Saenz, I. D., Munoz, S. Y., & Mauleon, M. A. (2024). Critical thinking and oratory to learn about dementia: The debate in nursing education. Gerokomos, 35(3), 148–152. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1134-928x2024000300003
Baltasar, C., D’Antonio Maceiras, S., Martín, A., & Camacho, D. (2024). Analysis of Climate Change Misleading Information in TikTok. In Sharma R., Penas A., & Sabir A. (Eds.), CEUR Workshop Proc. (Vol. 3782, pp. 54–61). CEUR-WS; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85207072147&partnerID=40&md5=25a3e60923da8b5855a608eb3d3268d3
Blyznyuk, T., & Kachak, T. (2024). BENEFITS OF INTERACTIVE LEARNING FOR STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IMPROVEMENT. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 11(1), 94–102. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.11.1.94-102
Burgos-Videla, C., Parada-Ulloa, M., & Martínez-Díaz, J. (2025). Critical thinking in the classroom: The historical method and historical discourse as tools for teaching social studies. Frontiers in Sociology, 10. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1526437
Carvalho, V., Costa, L., Teixeira, S., & Rodrigues, C. S. (2023). A PBL experience with second-year students of Industrial Engineering. In Orfali F., Lima R.M., Soares L., & Miranda F. (Eds.), Int. Symposium Project Approaches Eng. Educ. (Vol. 13, pp. 488–494). University of Minho; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85171269137&partnerID=40&md5=95cf1de2e3b88058676414a696ed6598
Gjini, K. (2024). Alternative teaching approaches: Economics for future generations. International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, 15(2), 150–167. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPEE.2024.144136
Huseynli, M., Ogbuachi, M. C., da Costa Silva, V. R., Dragan, A., & Bub, U. (2024). A Support Tool for Active Learning in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Am. Conf. Inf. Syst., AMCIS. 30th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2024. Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85213070415&partnerID=40&md5=207ecf2a5f11798a3e7275ffd1661534
Johnson, B. R., Logan, L. D., Darley, A., Stone, R. H., Smith, S. E., Osae, S. P., Thomas, I. S., Watts, M. T., & Welch, L. H. (2023). A Scoping Review for Debate-Style Journal Clubs in Health Professional Education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 87(6). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100064
Khamung, R., Majumdar, B., & Pongruengphant, R. (2016). Active learning for knowledge development and management: A case study at Bangsaen, Thailand. International Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 24(1), 1–17. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7955/cgp/v24i01/1-17
Latif, R., Mumtaz, S., Mumtaz, R., & Hussain, A. (2018). A comparison of debate and role play in enhancing critical thinking and communication skills of medical students during problem based learning. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 46(4), 336–342. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21124
Marcu, A., Gaspar, R., Rutsaert, P., Seibt, B., Fletcher, D., Verbeke, W., & Barnett, J. (2015). Analogies, metaphors, and wondering about the future: Lay sense-making around synthetic meat. Public Understanding of Science, 24(5), 547–562. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514521106
Mayaba, N. N. (2018). A reflection on language politics at Nelson Mandela University. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 36(1), 49–57. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2018.1452881
McMonagle, R. J., & Savitz, R. (2023). Active Learning: Beyond Structured Debates in Political Science Pedagogy. Journal of Political Science Education, 19(3), 355–370. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2022.2132164
Mellgren, C., & Ivert, A.-K. (2016). Criminal policy debate as an active learning strategy. Cogent Education, 3(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1184604
Napoleon, B., & Kuchenrither, C. (2023). Debates as an Active Learning Strategy to Enhance Students’ Knowledge of Ethics in Professional Nursing Practice and Health Care. Nurse Educator, 48(5), E163–E167. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001429
Ngoveni, M. (2025). Bridging the AI Knowledge Gap: The Urgent Need for AI Literacy and Institutional Support. International Journal of Technologies in Learning, 32(2), 83–100. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0144/CGP/v32i02/83-100
Ogunsanya, M. E., Wagner, J. L., Bennett, K., Medina, M. S., Starnes, S., & Planas, L. G. (2024). Debate as an Active Learning Pedagogy Among Pharmacy Students in a Public Health Course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 88(7). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.100724
Presado, M. H., Marques, F. M., Ferreira, Ó., Cardoso, M., Sousa, A. D., & Nascimento, T. (2022). Challenges to knowledge translation in the digital age. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 10. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.10.2022.e517
Quaggio, G. (2024). A Global Campus Beyond the Cold War. Peace and Disarmament Among Spanish Academics during the Debate on Joining and Remaining in NATO (1981-1986). Culture and History Digital Journal, 13(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3989/chdj.2024.293
Skalník, P. (2022). A New Approach to the Political Anthropology of Africa: From African Political Systems and Tribes without Rulers via The Early State. In African Political Systems Revisited: Changing Perspectives on Statehood and Power (pp. 102–121). Berghahn Books; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85134982185&partnerID=40&md5=7d2551bbdec642c0b555030ca4d2ea78
Treme, J. (2018). Classroom Debates: Using Speed Rounds To Encourage Greater Participation. College Teaching, 66(2), 86–87. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2017.1416330
Trindade, M. A. M. (2025). Debate and argumentation in e-learning times: An authentic assessment perspective. In The Emerald Handb. Of Active Learn. For Authentic Assess. (pp. 37–57). Emerald Publishing; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83797-857-120251003
Wang, Y. (2024). An interactive online educational environment to reduce anxiety, improve emotional well-being, and critical thinking for college students. Acta Psychologica, 248. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104347
